The California legislation is likely one of the most vital coverage efforts thus far from Democrats and civil rights teams, that are reacting to criticism that tech corporations aren’t doing sufficient to stop abuse on their platforms. Newsom’s signature alerts that states could play a extra important position in regulating the tech business, passing payments addressing content material moderation and privateness following inaction in Congress.
“California won’t stand by as social media is weaponized to unfold hate and disinformation that threaten our communities and foundational values as a rustic,” Newsom (D) mentioned in a information launch.
But main tech corporations and the commerce teams that symbolize them may carry authorized challenges in opposition to the California legislation. They’ve sued to dam different social media legal guidelines in conservative states comparable to Florida and Texas that may regulate how social media corporations police content material, in response to allegations that tech corporations are silencing conservative viewpoints.
Earlier this yr, tech business commerce teams took their battle to the Supreme Court docket, which briefly blocked the Texas legislation.
Though the California legislation goals to deal with very totally different issues about social media corporations, the business and a few authorized consultants have raised comparable First Modification issues in regards to the laws.
Eric Goldman, a professor at Santa Clara College College of Regulation, wrote in a latest weblog submit that A.B. 587 “has censorial penalties.”
“The invoice is more likely to be struck down as unconstitutional at substantial taxpayer expense,” he wrote.
